SIDE BY SIDE
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
Both are Qwen models. Qwen3.5-9B was added to OpenRouter on 2026-03-10, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B on 2026-02-25.
| Field | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Qwen |
| Family | Qwen | Qwen |
| Province | Silvergrass Fields | Silvergrass Fields |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Maximum output | 82K tokens | 236K tokens |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.140 | $0.170 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.00 | $0.250 |
| Accepts | text, images, video | text, images, video |
| Produces | text | text |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Added to OpenRouter | 2026-02-25 | 2026-03-10 |
| Model ID | qwen/qwen3.5-35b-a3b | qwen/qwen3.5-9b |
Questions and answers
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Qwen3.5-9B?
It depends on the mix: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is cheaper for input ($0.140 vs $0.170), Qwen3.5-9B for output ($0.250 vs $1.00) per million tokens. At three input tokens per output token, Qwen3.5-9B costs less. On input, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is 18% cheaper.
Which has the larger context window?
Both have a 262K-token context window.
What can one do that the other cannot?
Nothing among reasoning, tool use and image input: both support reasoning, tool use and image input.
Answers are computed from the 2026-10-24 catalog snapshot.